The Quiet Revolution – Should Jurors Defy The Law?

When the rule of law clashes with societal conscience, jury nullification stands as a potent testament to this tension. Drawing from historic cases like that of Clive Ponting, jurors have occasionally acquitted defendants, even when evidence points to guilt, guided by broader moral or societal beliefs. This “Quiet Revolution” poses pivotal questions: Can jurors reshape our understanding of justice, and should they be explicitly granted the power to challenge established legal norms?

“How Can You Defend Criminals?” – The Question Asked Of Every Lawyer

The presumption of innocence is a foundational principle in justice systems, with every individual deemed innocent until proven guilty. Legal representation is crucial in ensuring fairness, preventing wrongful convictions, and upholding the integrity of the legal process, emphasising that justice should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their background or means.

Too Young To Be A Criminal?

This blog post explores the dilemma of how society should address cases where children become perpetrators of alarming crimes. It discusses different perspectives on the Age of Criminal Responsibility (ACR), examining arguments for both lowering and raising the ACR, as well as alternative approaches such as restorative justice practices and education/prevention programs. The post emphasises the importance of finding a balance between accountability and rehabilitation for young offenders while creating a fair and just system.